
- Image via Wikipedia
Democracy: involves the government ruling and making laws for the “greater good” of all people, they may abolish personal rights in doing so. Democracy is government by and for the people. They may or may not be republics–that is, government limited by constitution or charter. The tricky part of “democracy” is defining “the people” and then deciding what counts as “by the people” and what counts as “for the people.” In a sense, that could be considered the content of democratic practice.
Republic: involves the government using and abiding by the constitution heavily. Personal rights are respected and cannot be taken away. This helps to avoid tyranny and monocracy (the majority makes laws and governs by passion, prejudice, or impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences). Republics are the common and “standard” type of governments found today, not democracies, despite what many people (who may not know the definition of either) think. Just as democracies may or may not be republics, republics may or may not be democracies.
Democracy and Republic are two forms of government which are distinguished by their treatment of the Minority, and the Individual, by the Majority. In a Democracy, the Majority has unlimited power over the Minority. This system of government does not provide a legal safeguard of the rights of the Individual and the Minority. It has been referred to as “Majority over Man”. In a Republic, the Majority is Limited and constrained by a written Constitution which protects the rights of the Individual and the Minority. The purpose of a Republic form of government is to control the Majority and to protect the God-given, inalienable rights and liberty of the Individual. The United States of America is founded as a Republic under the Constitution [Wiki Answers]. This definition of democracy and republic are in keeping with other definitions found on other sites, but I appreciated this definition the most, because I believe it best describes our American form of government.
A point that I want to reiterate from an earlier blog, is that our nation was founded on the principles of the Bible. The early settlers formed communities upon the Scripture, and believed that all constituents should be taught the Scriptures for purpose of community conduct and responsibility. Here are quotes from just a couple of the nation’s forming-fathers.
“The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity.” [July 4th, 1821] John Quincy Adams
“From the day of the Declaration [of Independence]…they [the American people] were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of The Gospel they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct.” [July 4th, 1821] John Quincy Adams Source: http://www.eadshome.com/JohnQuincyAdams.htm
James Madison is known as the father of the U.S. Constitution. He was also the fourth President of the United States. He was the primary author of the Bill of Rights and engineered the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. Madison believed Christianity to be the foundation upon which a just government must be built. Writing on June 20, 1785, he stated: Religion [is] the basis and Foundation of Government.
On November 9, 1772, Madison wrote to his close college friend, William Bradford:
A watchful eye must be kept on ourselves lest while we are building ideal monuments of renown and bliss here we neglect to have our names enrolled in the annals of Heaven. Source: http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/cdf/onug/madison.html
So this New World was intended to be a place of religious freedom, God-given rights, and government managed by the people. And some of these founders, though not perfect in their own execution of “righteousness,” knew the value and necessity of God. The freedoms to worship God, to vote, to acquire property, to acquire wealth, to speak freely, to protest, were born out of their respect for the sovereign will of God for this new world–freedom. Were there competing ideologies in the world that undermined the purposes of God for this country, yes there were, and still are.
The current population of the New World (USA) is over 300 million people. How do you govern and defend and educate and house and feed and clothe all those people? Charters, legislation, laws, courts, yes these are tools, but what about covenant. A covenant is a solemn promise to engage in or refrain from a specified action. It is commonly found in religious contexts, where it refers to sacred agreements between God and human beings. In theology, a covenant is a formal alliance or agreement made by God with a religious community or with humanity in general. An example of a covenant relationship in Judaism and Christianity is that between Abraham and God, in which God made a covenant with Abraham that He would bless Abraham’s descendants making them more numerous than the stars (Wikipedia)
All people who live by faith in God through the Lord Jesus Christ are the descendants of Abraham (Romans 4:16). The pilgrims and puritans and some of the forming fathers were people who lived by faith in God through Jesus Christ, and embraced the Judeo-Christian Bible as the Word of God. You could see that reflected in our forming documents, our pledge of allegiance, our money, our National Anthems. Because these people had faith in God, and established their new communities on the covenant of God, the covenant promise of blessing came on this country. That is why we were once known as the Most Powerful Country in the world. That is why people flocked here to get the “blessing,” you may have heard it called the “American” dream, but it is the “blessing of Abraham.” It is because of God and his commitment to covenant that this country had so much abundance.
We hear a great deal of talk about this country shifting to Socialism. A cultural definition of socialism is an economic system in which the production and distribution of goods are controlled substantially by the government rather than by private enterprise, and in which cooperation rather than competition guides economic activity. There are many varieties of socialism. Some socialists tolerate capitalism, as long as the government maintains the dominant influence over the economy; others insist on an abolition of private enterprise. All communists are socialists, but not all socialists are communists.
I see something in this definition that is alarming, and that’s the words government and dominance. Socialism is than a form of government where in the Creator God is no longer recognized, depended upon or honored., and that will mean the loss of our status as a republic which will eventually mean the loss of God-given, inalienable rights and liberty of the individual.
Source: socialism (n.d.). The American Heritage®New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Retrieved September 19, 2010, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/socialism
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.